As expected, with the presidential caucuses just completed
and primary election campaigns kicking into high gear, Nevada voter registration statistics for March,
2016 continue to show a slight shift away from the growth of Non-Partisan
voters. With minor exception, all registration groups; Democratic, Republican,
Non-Partisan, and minor parties gained voters across all demographics. However
in the more important statistic, voter share, the Democratic Party was the only
group to increase voter share across all sectors of the electorate. The numbers
are the complete opposite for the Republican Party, Non-Partisan, and minor
parties. Not only did they lose voter share, they lost share in all sectors.
If this trend continues until close of registration for the
general election it does not bode well for Republican chances to retain control
of the state legislature or at-risk congressional seats. Conversely, if the trend
subsides after close of registration for the primary and reverts back to
Non-Partisan gaining voter share at the expense of the two major parties, are
all bets off. My instinct tells me the later will come to pass.
The Non-Partisan and minor party loss of voter share leading
up to the primary election is normal when primary elections are closed,
restricted to those registered to vote in one of the major parties. If a person
registered to vote as Non-Partisan or in one of the minor parties wishes to
vote in a primary, they must re-register in the desired party. Since the
general election has no party restriction, chances are these voters will switch
back to their original registration following the primary. But will these new
party members actually vote in the primary? Primary election turnout has
averaged below 25 percent since 2000.
State-Wide
Party
|
Change in # Voters
|
% Change
|
% Voter Share
|
Difference in Voter Share %
|
D
|
16,320
|
3.36
|
40.07
|
0.61
|
R
|
4,399
|
1.01
|
35.30
|
-0.28
|
NP
|
982
|
0.42
|
18.68
|
-0.25
|
Other
|
492
|
0.66
|
5.95
|
-0.08
|
Total not D or R
|
|
|
24.63
|
-0.33
|
Democratic increase Feb / Mar in voter share over Republican
+1.39%
Clark County
Party
|
Change in # Voters
|
% Change
|
% Voter Share
|
Difference in Voter Share %
|
D
|
13,109
|
3.61
|
43.81
|
0.62
|
R
|
3,185
|
1.21
|
31.24
|
-0.29
|
NP
|
1,311
|
0.80
|
19.40
|
-0.27
|
Other
|
449
|
0.96
|
5.47
|
-0.14
|
Total not D or R
|
|
|
24.87
|
-0.41
|
Democratic increase Feb / Mar in voter share over Republican
+0.91%
Party
|
Change in # Voters
|
% Change
|
% Voter Share
|
Difference in Voter Share %
|
D
|
2,700
|
3.21
|
36.59
|
0.72
|
R
|
526
|
0.57
|
38.77
|
-0.24
|
NP
|
-321
|
-0.75
|
17.97
|
-0.35
|
Other
|
-113
|
-0.72
|
6.67
|
-0.30
|
Total not D or R
|
|
|
24.64
|
-0.65
|
Republican voter share over Democratic decreased Feb / Mar -0.96%
Rural Counties
Party
|
Change in # Voters
|
% Change
|
% Voter Share
|
Difference in Voter Share %
|
D
|
601
|
1.48
|
25.43
|
0.16
|
R
|
688
|
0.83
|
51.63
|
-0.02
|
NP
|
-8
|
-0.03
|
15.90
|
-0.14
|
Other
|
93
|
0.82
|
7.04
|
0
|
Total not D or R
|
|
|
22.94
|
-0.14
|
Republican voter share over Democratic decreased Feb / Mar
-0.18%
18 – 34 Year Old
Party
|
Change in # Voters
|
% Change
|
% Voter Share
|
Difference in Voter Share %
|
D
|
15,147
|
2.99
|
40.33
|
1.17
|
R
|
5,665
|
7.89
|
25.31
|
-0.36
|
NP
|
628
|
0.76
|
27.07
|
-0.66
|
Other
|
118
|
0.53
|
7.29
|
-0.15
|
Total not D or R
|
|
|
34.36
|
-0.81
|
Democratic increase Feb / Mar in voter share over Republican
+1.53%
55+
Party
|
Change in # Voters
|
% Change
|
% Voter Share
|
Difference in Voter Share %
|
D
|
4,351
|
2.01
|
40.51
|
0.36
|
R
|
1,902
|
0.85
|
41.21
|
-0.11
|
NP
|
-236
|
-0.32
|
13.33
|
-0.20
|
Other
|
29
|
0.11
|
4.95
|
-0.05
|
Total not D or R
|
|
|
18.53
|
-0.47
|
Republican voter share over Democratic decreased Feb / Mar
-0.07%
Given the low turnout of primary elections, it is
questionable if the closed primary’s systemic exclusion of eligible voters
produces the best results; effective and efficient government. This is
especially questionable in races where only one party has candidates running in
a primary and no Non-Partisan or minor party candidate has filed for the partisan
office. Under
a change to the Nevada elections statute made by the legislature in 2015,
the winner of the primary becomes the sole candidate in the general election.
In simple terms this means 20 - 25 percent of one political party’s registered
voters (perhaps less than 10 percent of the total electorate) elects the office
holder representing the entire constituency made up of voters of all
persuasions.
Primary elections have been part of our election process for
so long it’s possible some voters believe those elections and the parties
themselves are part of the U.S. and / or Nevada Constitution. Truth is political parties and primary
elections are not mentioned anywhere in the U.S.
Constitution. The Nevada
Constitution does mention political parties but only in the context of
requiring vacancies in partisan elected offices to be filled by a person of the
same political party and limiting membership on the state Supreme Court
Commission on Judicial Selection and Commission on Judicial Discipline to no
more than one from the same political party.
The state Constitution also mentions primary elections but only to the
point of limiting campaign contributions and ballot language related to a
candidate’s acceptance of term limits. Nowhere in the Nevada Constitution are
political parties or primary elections required.
I’ll continue to report monthly voter registration trends. The
important question of whether increased major party registrations translate
into increased voter turnout on June 14, 2016 is unknown. The Nevada
Election Modernization and Reform Act of 2017 (NEMRA – 2017) would make
this question irrelevant.
No comments:
Post a Comment