Voter registration
statistics for February, 2016 are in and no one should be surprised. However,
the changes in voter share do raise two major questions.
Voter registration efforts in February by the presidential
campaigns, major political parties, and candidates were successful in adding
another 25,712 active voters to the rolls. Combined with January’s increase,
41,661 new voters registered to vote during the first two months of 2016, an
increase of 3.48 percent. The Republican Party increased voter share at a
higher rate than the Democratic Party state-wide, in Clark County, in the rural
counties, and among those 55 years old and over. The Democratic Party out did
the GOP in Washoe County and with 18 – 34 year olds. Again, not surprising, the
increase in voter share of the two major political parties came at the expense
of voter share of Non-Partisan and the minor political parties.
Did the increase in voter share have a positive impact on
caucus participation? The answer is mixed. The Republican Party had their
highest caucus turnout since the parties went to the caucus system in 2008.
That’s not saying much though as only 18 percent of registered Republicans
caucused. On the Democratic side, 17 percent of registered Democrats attended
the caucus. This was down approximately nine percent from 2008 when there was
not an incumbent president running. Combined, only 13 percent of the total
electorate bothered to participate. And here lies the questions: Does increased
voter share lead to increased voter turnout beyond the small party base? Why
should any voter have to compromise their principles, beliefs, or personal
integrity in order to cast a ballot?
State-Wide
Party
|
Change in # Voters
|
% Change
|
% Voter Share
|
Difference in Voter Share %
|
D
|
13,851
|
2.94
|
39.46
|
0.31
|
R
|
14,212
|
3.36
|
35.58
|
0.42
|
NP
|
-1,407
|
-0.60
|
18.93
|
-0.53
|
Other
|
-944
|
-1.26
|
6.03
|
-0.20
|
Total not D or R
|
24.96
|
-0.73
|
Clark County
Party
|
Change in # Voters
|
% Change
|
% Voter Share
|
Difference in Voter Share %
|
D
|
9,914
|
2.83
|
43.19
|
0.25
|
R
|
8,758
|
3.44
|
31.53
|
0.38
|
NP
|
-304
|
-0.18
|
19.67
|
-0.47
|
Other
|
-296
|
-0.63
|
5.61
|
-0.16
|
Total not D or R
|
25.28
|
-0.63
|
Washoe County
Party
|
Change in # Voters
|
% Change
|
% Voter Share
|
Difference in Voter Share %
|
D
|
2,839
|
3.49
|
35.87
|
0.52
|
R
|
2,795
|
3.15
|
39.01
|
0.44
|
NP
|
-656
|
-1.50
|
18.32
|
-0.65
|
Other
|
-401
|
-2.45
|
6.80
|
-0.30
|
Total not D or R
|
25.12
|
-0.95
|
Rural Counties
Party
|
Change in # Voters
|
% Change
|
% Voter Share
|
Difference in Voter Share %
|
D
|
1,098
|
2.78
|
25.27
|
0.20
|
R
|
2,659
|
3.32
|
51.65
|
0.69
|
NP
|
-447
|
-1.71
|
16.04
|
-0.59
|
Other
|
-247
|
-2.14
|
7.04
|
-0.30
|
Total not D or R
|
23.08
|
-0.89
|
18 – 34 Year Old
Party
|
Change in # Voters
|
% Change
|
% Voter Share
|
Difference in Voter Share %
|
D
|
7,690
|
7.11
|
39.16
|
1.10
|
R
|
4,205
|
5.86
|
25.67
|
0.43
|
NP
|
-110
|
-0.13
|
27.73
|
-1.17
|
Other
|
-140
|
-2.14
|
7.44
|
-0.42
|
Total not D or R
|
35.17
|
-1.59
|
55+
Party
|
Change in # Voters
|
% Change
|
% Voter Share
|
Difference in Voter Share %
|
D
|
2,582
|
1.21
|
40.15
|
-0.03
|
R
|
5,394
|
2.48
|
41.32
|
0.49
|
NP
|
-787
|
-1.07
|
13.53
|
-0.32
|
Other
|
-459
|
-1.67
|
5.00
|
-0.15
|
Total not D or R
|
18.53
|
-0.47
|
The above trend is similar when looking at individual state
assembly and senate districts. In the senate, the changes were small still
leaving 11 districts (52.38%) where the number of voters registered as
Non-Partisan or total not registered as either Democratic or Republican either
exceeds or is within five percent of one of the major political parties. In the
assembly, 21 (50.00%) districts have the number of voters registered as
Non-Partisan or total not registered as either Democratic or Republican exceeding
or within five percent of one of the major political parties. This is a
decrease of four, however, those four districts do not fall into this category
by less than one-tenth of one percent.
Does increased voter share lead to increased voter
turnout beyond the small party base? Looking at the numbers for February, the
answer has to be no. Given recent primary election turnout, it is doubtful this
will change in June. Leading Nevada political analyst Jon Ralston summed it up
in his March
2, 2016 Ralston Reports “Trump Effect will continue to resonate in Nevada” when he
says: The
numbers do not lie. The caucus turnout was 75,000, which more than doubled what
it was four years ago but still represents less than 18 percent of the GOP
electorate. Compare that to the last two cycles: In the 2014 primary, it was 19
percent, the same as it was in 2012. No reason not to believe the June
electorate will be similar to the caucus electorate.”
Why should any voter
have to compromise their principles, beliefs, or personal integrity in order to
cast a ballot? The willingness not to
compromise their principals, beliefs, or personal integrity is a high standard
we hold those we are voting for to. Voters should not have to compromise
theirs. Expanding the voter pool and giving voters a reason to go to the polls,
not simply increasing voter share, will increase voter turnout. That is what
the Nevada
Election Modernization and Reform Act of 2017 (NEMRA – 2017) proposes to
accomplish.
No comments:
Post a Comment